Babbage

Science and technology

Technology trade shows

Silicon implants

Jan 29th 2012, 8:58 by G.F. | SAN FRANCISCO

THE comely women in abbreviated, form-fitting dresses or in tight shirts and hot pants would seem more appropriate as servers at Hooter's or a modern gentlemen's club. Yet "booth babes" are walking the floor at Macworld|iWorld, a professional conference aimed both at consumers and at professionals in the creative arts and information technology. A minor uproar accompanied their annual appearance at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas in January, but they are both more typical there and seem less unusual among the mostly male attendees and amid the other sorts of Sin City's public and private entertainment.

Babbage has attended Macworld nearly every year since the late 1990s, and it was previously not uncommon to find well-turned-out female and male marketing types at the front of booths using their gender as a slight advantage to attract an audience that was only slightly male-heavy. Distaff engineers, executives and attendees are unremarkable because the Macintosh platform was long used primarily in professions, like graphic design, in which gender ratios in the workplace are typically even. Married couples are a frequent sight roaming the aisles at the trade show portion, sometimes in matching vintage rainbow Apple logo shirts.

But a few years ago the first professionally contracted female forms arrived at the show. (The show is run by IDG, a privately held publishing and event firm; Apple stopped its participation in 2009.) Despite the high level of female visitors, Chippendales equivalents are nowhere to be seen. Your correspondent has a variety of conflicting feelings about the booth babes, who were the topic of much discussion. Deployment of pretty young things to reel men in is so blatant a ploy that cognitive dissonance soon sets in. Being a man, Babbage cannot deny evolution's impact on his admiration of attractive women. Yet he resents it being used against him.

Worse is in the company of female colleagues, such as friend and fellow writer Dori Smith, when encountering a member of the gazelles with booth numbers or, most egregiously, 2D bar codes upon their derrieres and logos at their crotches. Babbage runs through desire, repulsion, embarrassment (for himself), embarrassment (for his colleagues) and embarrassment (for the models). The hired hands, by the way, are at ease and either enjoying themselves or superb actresses.

Ms Smith has an informal chart from a few years ago addressing the booth-babe issue in which she plots how the use of the terms women, babes and chicks varies by age and looks. As for companies, she tells Babbage, there are three sorts. Those with a product sell it at the show. Those without one plug what is coming. The remainder hire models.

(Photo credit: G.F.)

Readers' comments

The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.

guest-ilalnso

THE TRADE FAIR WITH BIG BOOST
EXHIBIT INDIA , is an organization which brings together companies which conceive, create, develop, manage, market, sponsor, supply or service trade exhibitions and consumer events.
Our aim is to be the voice of the multi-billion event organizing industry, to serve the collective needs of event organizers and to promote the interests of the industry at large .Representing contractors and suppliers of goods and services to the exhibition industry.
The development of a closer relationship and understanding between organizers their suppliers and venues can only benefit the industry as a whole. This closer relationship is partly demonstrated by way of joint working groups covering a range of issues into which all sides of the industry have an important input. It is also a major step towards the goal of enabling the industry to speak with a united voice when striving to increase its share of the marketing cake.
http://www.exhibitindia.com/

Darwins Toothpick

The type of males we are and the civilizations we’ve built has been shaped by the choices women made for thousands of years. They liked powerful, ambitious men but also gadget-makers and the presentation of those gadgets by beautiful women tries to tell you that if you are a successful gadget-man you can have her. It’s called sexual selection and we often feel uncomfortable because we know deep down very well how much power young beautiful women have over us and some of these women just cut the corners to get what they want.

Bertymandias

I'm suprised nobody has touched on how juvenile the whole booth babe thing is, how lacking in class. It's a sad indictment of what they think of their customers.

Then again if an Ipad 2 came with a happy ending then I wouldn't cock a snook. Perhaps in the interest of political correctness we could have "his and hers" happy endings. To capture the Apple brand the staff could be all bespectecled and wearing plaid overshirts over their apple uniforms; the Polyphonic Spree playing over the speakers. The surfaces all that easy-wipe, cream coloured, thing they've got going on.

All very civilised.

mark anthony

Really this is a non story , beautiful girls have been used to attract attention at trade shows for years and for all products e.g ISM confectionery fair, Anuga food fair, Duty Free exhibition. And from the biggest company to the smallest you can guarantee if there is a new product being launched then what better combination than a beautiful girl and a box of chocolates or a bottle of wine!!!!!

Diggerby

Nothing new about it for the tech shows in (East) Asia. As far as I know it started in Japan, and then Korea, Hong Kong Taiwan, SE Asia and Mainland China.

iZcWZKqtea

I was at a Computer Aided Designer Show (cad/cam ) which was attended by mainly high level scientific types and high powered computer geeks and the exhibit that drew the biggest crowds was one that did a western cow girl skit with scantily clad , beautiful girls. I watched it twice because it found it so offensive!

Nirvana-bound

Sleaze reigns supreme. Being openly 'slutty' is no longer frowned upon. Infact, to watch these models comport (flaunt?) themselves, one is made to feel that's the way it should be.

Like you wrote, leaves most males arroused, embarassed & repulsed by this naked prurience. How primal..

gzuckier

Yes, I am certainly hoping to give my daughters good work ethics and educations, so that they may find satisfaction and contribute to the world by wearing clothing which enhances their sexual characteristics and smiling at every goober who walks by as if he were the cleverest and most enchanting person to walk the earth, before they go home and soak their aching feet (assuming they're lucky enough to land jobs with employers who do not require them to do a little of that nocturnal overtime marketing which is often part of the job).

scott@scottshuster.com

The mere existence of this article implies that in the view of the Economist editors there is something questionable about the employment of 'attractive' persons' in a demanding selling environment where 'attracting' attention spells the difference between success and failure.

Is that indeed your considered view? I doubt it. You know there is nothing at all wrong with the employment of models on a trade show floor, no matter how sexy or silly their attire.

To the contrary, with the publication of this commentary and its inclusion in your high-profile weekly e-mailed promotion (was there nothing more worthy of inclusion on the exalted list of seven articles that fits in that promotion?) you demonstrate that like those very booth-renters whose selling decisions you question, you too will not hesitate to push "babes" and "silicon implants" out into the aisle to try to "reel in" readers.

I would say "why don't you sweep around your own back door"…except for the fact that there is nothing wrong with what you did either.

Take the rest of the day off, Babbage, and go see a doctor about your distaste for your own desires.

Gnorzo

How very "made in America" this problem is.

Every woman in the US has plastic surgery, liposuctions and botox injections about three dozen times between high school and the geriatric ward. On top of that, add three to four diets every year. But in the name of "politically correctness", you still feel threatened instead of inspired when you see a woman who looks like she's exercising regularly and wears a size small or xtra small dress?

Every man in the US is downloading raunchy movies or buying magazines wrapped in opaque plastic. Just lookee no touchee strip joints are big business, burlesque dancers are stars. But you guys feel "resentful and embarrassed" when you see pretty girls at a convention?

Why not just enjoy the view rather than go into another masochistic american guilt ritual? Puzzles me...

The only real oddity is the absence of chippendales type male models at conventions. With up to one half of the crowd possibly attracted to guys, counting all straight and gay people attending, the conclusion must be that there is no audience and thus no business case for hiring male models. I wonder what the reason for that could be...

ShawnKing

You rail against "Booth Babes" and yet headline your article "Silicon Implants"...You use the same tactics you decry vendors use. Tad hypocritical, don't you think?

If I told you you had a beautiful headline, would you hold it against me?

The frisson of dissonance in titling an article provocatively (but with the pun intended), and in using a long-distance photo illustrating the effect for readers who have not attended such shows would be the intent here. The article isn't salacious.

jomiku

I like the girls because I like girls but the comments that end the post are largely right: you hire pretty girls to sell things because you are trying to draw attention to a product that otherwise doesn't draw attention. In rare cases, that might be because the product category is relatively obscure and deserves more mind share but in most it's just show. Some companies need to feel good about buzz. It may be all they have.

My all time favorite acts at shows are two guys. One is (was?) Joel somebody who did a magnificent act using huge cards and a mesmerizing tone - "step closer". He'd play poker against a guy in the crowd, showing him his cards and discombobulate the guy so much he'd always win. Beautiful, high level carny work. The other was an escape artist who'd break out of strait jackets and the like. Cool shows.

G.F. - The Economist

I have since learned that taller models are paid more. There was an odd sight at one booth (the one pictured above, although I missed capturing a photo of it) in which two comely giraffes stood next to several in a second species, all a foot shorter, but equally attractive. One cannot escape the pecking order.

So? Some people are paid more than others: I read about this in The Economist.

What are you: Some kind of a Victorian throwback? You are criticizing the innate nature of human beings. This is not 'odd,' nor 'atavistic' - it's normal. Your are the one who is behaving strangely in this matter. Oh there are married couples in the aisles who might SEE THE MODELS? Implication: That would be...bad? Why? What's the matter with you? The world is full of persons who are more attractive or less attractive...what, do you want to cover them up if they are better looking than you?

Are you seeking to use the influential megaphone of The Economist to mount a global protest over the presence of attractive salespersons at trade shows? If not, how would you do that other than by beginning in exactly this way?

By questioning the propriety of employing attractive salespersons you are placing at risk the jobs and businesses of thousands of such performers, their agencies, and even the trade show success of thousands of exhibitors.

Trade show owners and exhibitors know what works. The day-labor employees you look askance upon work very, very hard and deliver proven value. You have made a fool of yourself and your publication with this commentary. Continued defensive bleating about this 'topic' -- other than a wholesale retraction -- will only make matters worse.

Your correspondent's observations aren't intended to change the world, only reveal parts of it to a broader audience who may not have experienced it.

If only Babbage had the power to destroy institutions at his whim!

Mr Shuster, by the way, is a hired conference facilitator, who provides master of ceremonies and interview functions for corporate events. This profession is a distant relative of the booth babe, rather on the extreme opposite end of the conference/trade show hired hand spectrum, but is often made available to let by the same firms that employ those with more visible than cerebral assets.

Snakes and Ladders

Here's an idea - have a booth-babe beauty contest in the middle of the show. Turn it into a true meat market with advertising prestige for the winner and disses for the losers. And keep track of who bothers to vote, and ask them if they would buy the actual product on the babe's bikini.

I say this not because I actually want to attend any of this, but because a good way to kill bad advertising is to actually measure its effect in some way and then let the people paying for it know the dismal results of all their spending.

Orwelle

"Being a man, Babbage cannot deny evolution's impact on his admiration of attractive women. Yet he resents it being used against him."

Exactly -- this kind of advertising exploits men.

About Babbage

In this blog, our correspondents report on the intersections between science, technology, culture and policy. The blog takes its name from Charles Babbage, a Victorian mathematician and engineer who designed a mechanical computer.

Advertisement

Babbage audio

Trending topics

Read comments on the site's most popular topics

Advertisement

Products & events