Jul 18th 2011, 9:40 by A.R. | SRINAGAR
WHEN newspaper-reading outsiders think of Kashmir these days, they understandably conjure images of stone-throwing youths, repressive soldiers, curfews and conflict. Yet in the lulls between confrontations, when Kashmir’s separatists pause from exhaustion and the number of militants creeping over from across the border is at low tide, another Kashmir flourishes.
It is tourist season now in Srinagar, the summer capital of the state of Jammu and Kashmir. Not only is it much cooler here in the hills than down on the plains, it is also time for Hindu pilgrims, or yatris, to trudge up (or, more often, drive up) from humid and low-lying Jammu to visit the sacred site of a big ice stalagmite within a cave, the Amarnath temple. The way from Jammu to Srinagar, a picturesque and vertigo-inducing road that clings to cliff edges, somehow accommodates hurtling buses, lorries, army convoys and long lines of taxis and cars. There is little more to keep them from spinning off the ledge than cheery warning signs stuck up by the Indian army, suggesting “this is a highway, not a runway, don’t take off” and reminding those tempted to drink and drive that “life is risky after whisky”. It was crammed to bursting on July 17th, with the yatris pausing at roadside stalls run by fellow believers dishing out free food and water.
Srinagar itself is breathing a sigh of relief that this tourist season, so far, has not been disrupted by the sort of violence that erupted each of the past three years. Indian police and soldiers are apparently better-trained, less heavy-handed, and so less likely to abuse locals in such a manner as to restart months of protest. In turn the locals, seeing what little they achieved during the previous summers’ protests, beyond the loss of life and income, are focused for now on making a living.
The many wooden houseboats on Dal lake, at the heart of the town, are crammed with holidaymakers. More surprising, and less welcome, is the presence of jet-skis roaring noisily in circles around the lake, while other tourists queue to take their turns. As surprising, staring over the lake from a rocky outcropping, is a newly opened five-star hotel, with no vacancies. Indian-brand coffee shops are sprouting in bunches.
It is a reminder that Kashmir, for all its political misery, is not a poor place by Indian standards. Though there is high unemployment among Kashmiris, many of whom are quite well-educated, the state also draws in labourers from the rest of India to do menial toil. Early in the morning the road south from Srinagar, towards an area where saffron is grown, is lined with young men from Bihar who are eager to work fields or on construction sites for a daily wage of about 200 rupees (about $4). Kashmir is in the midst, too, of a building boom, with young men needed to port bricks and sacks of concrete.
Kashmiris remain roughly as well-off as the average Indian, keeping up with the rapidly growing national economy. And compared with Pakistan next door, where economic misery is matched only by the political kind, Kashmir looks increasingly well off. Locals point out that despite the conflict (indeed, at times, because of it) these mountain valleys draw in money: in the good times tourism blossoms—even in the winter, when the more adventurous head to Gulmarg ski resort—and in the bad times horticulture and the handicraft industry keep plugging along. In addition the Indian state spends heavily in Kashmir, with various development programmes. And the presence of several hundred thousand soldiers in the state, for all the repressive ills it brings the Kashmiris, also adds significant demand for goods and services to the local economy.
Few foreigners are evident in Kashmir at the moment, but with throngs of Indians hurtling about on jet-skis, packing out new hotels and cramming the roads, an unmistakable hum of orderly leisure fills the air. Foreign tourists, in time, may drift back too. How long will this situation last? It could persist happily for years, or, as likely, it could end tomorrow.
(Picture credit: Wikimedia Commons)
In this blog, our Asia correspondents and our Banyan columnist provide comment and analysis on Asia's political and cultural landscape. The blog takes its name from the Banyan tree, under which Buddha attained enlightenment and Gujarati merchants used to conduct business.
Advertisement
Over the past five days
Over the past seven days
Advertisement
Readers' comments
The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.
Sort:
Places become less popular, less of a tourist hot spot and more of a run down area. It happens all the time in lots of countries. Especially in America where a lot of cities have lost their popularity. Get over it, not every city can stay nice and beautiful forever.
It's great to see that such a bright future is possible in the economy of Kashmir. Hopefully their will be little reason to cause protests to disrupt the great potential their economy is showing. With the immense amount natural beauty surrounding Kashmir tourists will not stay away much longer especially during a time without protests. With the natural beauty, brand new five star hotel, and Indian coffee shops springing up it is just a matter of time before tourism explodes in Kashmir.
@Doctorwhorules
Must be chilly so high up on your pedestal. I am an American, I know as do many other Americans that Kashmir is not where cashmere sweaters come from. So as you attempt to make fun of Americans for being ignorant maybe you yourself should not be ignorant enough to post stereotypical comments.
I am just wondering how this article on Kashmir got spared by army of indian online raiders.
some of the journalists, media have been projecting structured anti-India report repeatedly. A false statement repeated thousand times appears to be true, likewise these media people are behaving. People of J&K are divided, when Karachi was the capital of Pakistan J7K was too far, now Islamabad is very close, some have the advantage in proximity. But Indian Govt. has been spending good lot on defence, infrastructure development etc to prove J&K people can be very safe in being part of Indian democracy as compared to political atmosphere in Pakistan.
I recollect my family visit to Jammu and Srinagar in oct 1974, more peaceful than today, it was really Tourists paradise, particularly for those who could not visit Switzerland and such other places. Valley area of this state mainly depends on tourism. Now we find only military, para-military, police officials everywhere creating war like situation by the conflict between India and Pakistan. Already this state has been divided, a part is now in possession with Pakistan forcibly. Even one thousand years is not enough to settle this conflict, there is urgent need to amicably settle the issue, create peaceful atmosphere, allow more tourists to pour in for the prosperity of the state/people here.
Hear the word "Kashmir" and most Americans will think that's where those "cashmere" sweaters come from.
@guest-ijselil
I see your point. However, I am tired of this silly business of pro-India and anti-India. If there is an article which criticizes India's record on something, why is that article anti-India? Such a silly way of thinking! We Indians want to have it both ways. We want to take pride in our democracy - at the same time we react to criticism in the same way a nationalist Chinese would. (by labelling criticism coming from any Western source as "anti-India").
@khichuri1: Ouch. Someone ate a bit much khichuri...I think RB was just being tongue in cheek
@ Ruchira Bhatia,
Why don't you keep your complex out of this? There are lots of "pro-India" articles in The Economist- in any case the job of journalists is to critique - not to act as propagandists for the Indian government. If there is an Economist aritcle criticizing India's human rights record or criticizing the continued practice of "untouchability" in parts of rural India (shameful), you guys will accuse the magazine of being anti-India. Grow up, stop being juvenile, stop being defensive and learn how to react maturely/constructively to legitimate criticism. Surely, as citizens of the world's largest democracy, people can expect this much from us?
Um, I'm sorry, this is The Economist, isn't it? Am I actually sensing a pro-Indian article in this august magazine? What did I miss?