Feb 9th 2012, 11:15 by Buttonwood
READING the daily headlines on Greece, a lot of historical parallels come to mind - notably the situation of Britain in 1931. Then a minority Labour government was told by a committee, headed by a City grandee Sir George May, that it needed to make public spending cuts in order to keep on the gold standard. What stuck in the craw of the cabinet was a demand to cut unemployment benefit by 20%. The government fell to be replaced by a broadly-based (but Conservative-dominated) coalition; it eventually gave up on the gold standard. Britain never returned to it. In the mythology of the Labour party, this was a "bankers' ramp" (or racket) that brought down a government.
Greece, of course, has already replaced its Socailist prime minister with a new government headed by an unelected central banker. Even he, however, depends on support from the main parties. There is just a limit on how much pain politicians will impose on voters at the behest of (often foreign) creditors.
Of course, when Britain did leave the gold standard, the results were much less damaging than the bankers feared; indeed, many economists think the move set the country on the path to recovery. It seems less likely that the same could be said if Greece left the euro; its banks and corporate sector wouild be faced with bankruptcy (their debts would still be in euros but their revenues in devalued drachmas). They would still need aid from their EU partners. However, there is an element of mutually assured destruction about this; the contagion effects on Portugal, Spain and Italy might be huge. That suggests in the long run Greece will default not just to private sector creditors but to official creditors as well; and the rest of Europe will have to lump it.
In this blog, our Buttonwood columnist grapples with the ever-changing financial markets and the motley crew who earn their living by attempting to master them. The blog is named after the 1792 agreement that regulated the informal brokerage conducted under a buttonwood tree on Wall Street.
Advertisement
Over the past five days
Over the past seven days
Advertisement
Readers' comments
The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.
Sort:
Does anyone remember pre-crisis Greece?
I am a younger guy, and my family visited during the 2004 Olympics. I remember thinking even then "Wow, these people lead some kind of life". A 35 hour workweek was deemed hard enough for frequent naps, smoking breaks, and simple inattentiveness on the job, entire businesses were closed after 3pm, and cabs showed only a vague interest in actually picking up passengers, because they were so heavily unionized they'd end up being paid anyway. Even a 14 year-old with no intimate knowledge of Greek government could sense that something was wrong. The people were lazy.
Now I'm not saying that the Greeks aren't hurting now, they most certainly are. But noone should think that this was forced on them by an external force. Voters voted in the Socialist Party, and begged for more and more public jobs/services/guarantees. Politicians passed the laws, banks financed them. As recently as last year my friend went on a tour of Greece. When I asked what stood out, his eyes immediately lit up describing their easy lifestyle, and again how he couldn't find a store open past hours considered more than normal here in America.
Now eleventh-hour creditors are running in to save their hides, and Greeks are paying for it in priviledges they shouldn't have had in the first place, and then some. It was obvious and inevitable to a 14 year-old boy 7 years ago
This cold austere European winter we are suplementing our home heating with building timber off cuts, starting the fire with dried mandarin peels and newspaper.
Austerity measures are unpopular as per some as well.
But austerity measures which include productive spending cuts, are not at all a good thing for an economy.
http://naveenkalyani.blog.com/2012/02/13/greece-default-and-the-euro-aba...
Recovery and austerity are diametrical opposites just creating a “catch 22” situation. For economic matters to recover is by adhering to what the “Laws of Economic dictates us to follow. This means for everyone is work/income subject to the desire to improve our living standards.
http://theworldmonetaryordertocome.blogspot.com/2010/11/introduction.html
There are no limits on how much austerity a coalition government can impose on its so called electorate. Representatives are asked to resign beforehand if they cannot approve the measures asked for in good conscience. They are then easily replaced with someone who is all to willing to take the job and tow the coalition governments austerity line.
European banks want to be paid, and Greek banks want to be bailed out. So, it is a marriage made in heaven. Austerity plays the simple role of not allowing the Greek people to spend the loans on their needs. You see, most, if not all of the loaned money must go right back to pay the banks.
Of course, government officials cannot be seen in public. This is easy enough to do. Who has the appetite to be burdened with the problems of the underclass they are creating anyway? Also, it may even eventually become dangerous!
The illusion of political choice. It exists everywhere, but rears its ugly head most in the poorest of globalized places.
Also, those that resign due to principle, can always run again later, on a platform of: "I'm the only one who stood up to those bullies!"
Yes, of course you did. Tell us all again how you slayed the dragon. Children gather round. Our politician is going to tell us another bed time story. Oh, how I love stories...
Wondering why Greece does not leave the Euro? It's obvious. Greece, like all other nations, has the best politicians that banking and corporate money interests can buy.
You see, we're all quite similar. Some of us just have the good fortune to be born in a richer nation. Of course many of us deserve to be born to privileged societies, because greatness always seeks out and finds greatness. Right girls?
I know, because I chose to be born in America. I remember as a fetus, that I specifically made that request to be born here. You're laughing I can see, but I'm perfectly serious.
A more apt comparison is with 1920's Germany :
"It is what can happen if you join a fixed exchange system, then take out very large debts in what amounts to a foreign currency, and then have simultaneous monetary and fiscal contraction imposed upon you.
Germany discovered this on the Gold Standard when it racked up external debt from 1925 to 1929 (owed to American bankers) in much the same way as Greece has done.
When the music stopped – ie, when the Fed raised rates from 1928 onwards – Germany blew apart in much the same way as Greece is blowing apart. This is not a cultural or anthropological issue. It is the mechanical consequence of capital flows into a country that cannot handle it, as Germany could not handle it in the late 1920s."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/
you cannot compare Greece 2012with Germany 1928..only backwardedly minded British Empire nostaligsts may think so..these Anglo anti German hatemongers just deny a new world order fueled by BRICs, MINTs and NEXT11 etc. pp...
you cannot compare Greece 2012 with Germany 1928..only backwardedly minded British Empire nostaligsts may think so..these Anglo anti German hatemongers just deny a new world order fueled by BRICs, MINTs and NEXT11 etc. pp...
http://thebottomline-us.blogspot.com/2012/02/divergent-union-part-2-econ... The second part of an ongoing series on the European sovereign debt crisis, this post discusses some economics fundamentals.
We ignored the lessons of history to get into this mess; why stop now?
Since Greece cannot devalue its currency or raise tariffs for goods and services from other EU countries with which it has trade imbalances, the entire burden of its debt obligations falls on its labor force with higher taxes, lower wages, and fewer social benefits. A labor force unable to add enough value to goods and services within its economy to repay those debts. The leaders of the EU must know Greece will never be able to earn enough revenues to sustain its debts, yet they continue to exact a misery on the Greeks that will not resolve the problem. Greeks should return the favor, but perhaps they should borrow as much as they can before defaulting, exiting the Euro, and following Argentina's example in order to ensure that misery is shared with finance capitalists.
In theory, other member states can impose a special VAT on export to Greece. There's no reason why export has to be zero-rated. Instead of an 100% rebate, countries would give only 90% to exporters if the export's destination is Greece. The money collected can then be use to pay down loans the country got from EFSF/ESM.
Do you expect Germany to impose a special VAT on its exports to Greece?
"...they should borrow as much as they can before defaulting, exiting the Euro, and following Argentina's example..."
It would appear that you have peeked at the last page of the Pan-Hellenic Plan for Painless Prosperity, formerly know as Kirchner's Cookbook.
What do you mean "exact misery"? They are free to decide to do as they wish, and to look for people to lend to them at a rate that is acceptable to them. Your post contains a ciruclar reference: because European taxpayers/states do not want to dump money in black hole, you feel that they are "exacting misery" on Greece and therefore Greece should take "revenge" on them by borrowing from them and not paying back. But even if Greece wasn't trying to take revenge they could not pay back, that is why the states are putting pressure on them, not because they are a bunch of sadists who need to be punished. Or do you think that if we give money freely, no strings attached, and Greece will be able to pay lavish social benefits, dodge taxes, bloat their bureacracy and stay entrenched in their kartels as if by magic growth will return. That is the fallacy if all socialists: they think that if you expropriate those who have a bit of money left and give it to whoever has advertised himself best as being "poor", "needy", then justice will be restored and we all will live happily everafter. Actually, you couldn't give a damn whether the money is repaid to northern European taxpayers: after all we are all white, colonial plutocrats, in for a bit of well-deserved punishment, aren't we?
"Greeks ... should borrow as much as they can before defaulting, exiting the Euro, and following Argentina's example"
---------------------------------------------------------
That's what they are already doing - the rest of EU senses that and that's why they are reluctant to give the Greeks more money.
And using Argentina as an example of anything is comical.
Good luck on obtaining more loans...
...I know that debtors universally resent their creditors, but whence this sympathy for the Greeks? From top to bottom, they have been gaming their system, evading taxes; lying through their teeth about their true financial situation; featherbedding their industries...and now, the attitude is - among highly educated Greeks no less, not just the lumpen proletariat - "Well, let the Germans pay; they didn't pay enough for what they did to us in the war."
Er, guys: it's game over.
More like echoes of Groundhog Day (the movie).
German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble said the Greek plan was "not at a stage where it can be signed off".
Few details of the plan have been released, but unions have already called a 48-hour strike in protest.
Luxembourg's Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker, head of the so-called eurogroup of finance ministers, said he doubted whether the Greek plan was ready for approval.
"I do not have reasons to believe that there will be a definitive deal this evening," he told reporters as he arrived for the Brussels meeting.
But he hailed the progress Greece had made and said eurozone countries were likely to thrash out a deal with Athens by next week.
"Of course, when Britain did leave the gold standard, the results were much less damaging than the bankers feared..."
Who cares if leaving the gold standard was less damaging to bankers. Retirees had a portion of their pensions and life savings confiscated. Employees were able to buy less with their pay.
Its the little people who get harmed by printing. A drachma worth 50% of the Euro means that their retirees have just lost half of their pensions and life savings. Employees are now getting paid half as much. What about them?
But those pensions and savings never were worth what their face value represented. They were inflated due to the falsifications of the Greek government.
So the return/drop to their real value may be a nasty surprise. But it is hardly a confiscation of something that was real before.
"Retirees had a portion of their pensions and life savings confiscated. Employees were able to buy less with their pay..."
Completely untrue. Britain was stuck in a severe deflationary spiral in 1931 - prices were falling, so life savings and pensions were becoming ever more valuable. Employees were far more worried about remaining employees than what their pay was. The real devaluation enabled by abandoning the gold standard was just what was needed to stop deflationary expectations.
None of this is relevant to Greece's circumstances now, but anyone who knows anything about the Great Depression knows that recovery was led by those countries that abandoned the gold standard earliest. It came latest - indeed barely at all - to France who insisted on staying on it to 1936.
Yes. Much like housing prices/value today.
"What about them?"
-------------------------
They should elect more honest people in the future. People who will not falsify statistics (I'm amazed no one went to jail fr that), who will not make foolish promises of extravagant benefits, who have the courage to tackle privileges, barriers and rigidities in the labor and services markets, who will not compromise on taking the approriate taxes to pay for government services, etc.
I feel for the "little people", I really do. But they have to recognize 2 facts. First: they were never that wealthy in the first place, despite the illusion sold with the common currency. Second: political choices matter - chose someone vain, irresponsible and dishonest, and you'll have to deal with the consequences.
How are the voters meant to know which of the politicians is honest, how many taxes are appropriate to pay for government services, or what constitutes extravagant benefits? What can the voters do if the bureaucrats are falsifying statistics? Sure Greece is a democracy, but your comment lays a lot of responsibility on the Greeks who made those political choices as though they are the main ones responsible for this. I don't think that is fair.
Opt in the creditors.
Make them a part of the recovery.
Find a way to re-package Greece's debt in such a way that allows Greece to re-pay their debt down the road at guaranteed rates.
The creditors will still get their money, they just have to wait.
That or they can be given the opportunity to get out now with nothing but the benefit of being free of Greece.
130 billions is more than one third of the GDP of Greece.Let's call it a gracious present,rather than a loan.They will never give back that money.The equation is simple:more sacrifices,more fall of the GDP,and so on with that music till the end of the game for breakdown of the juke box.
"Their debts would still be in euros but their revenues in devalued drachmas."
I'm not sure about this. It's certainly a tricky legal question, but I wouldn't be so sure of the outcome.
You are right! They will just change the law and repay in Drachme or not repay at all. They don't have to care about their reputation as they have none left. They will just beg and blackmail the EU with its professed socialist principles. We will have Zimbabwe on our doorstep for a few decades at least. THey also do not have to care that we come and get it by force, as that is also "not done" in the EU. In the old days, when Byzantium was in debt, the Venetians just took a few islands and that was it. Fair enough, the Byzantines even agreed. If we would do that now, it would be solved. The islands can stay Greek, they just have to become private property of creditors, who can auction parcels of land off for Germans etc. to build a holiday house or resort. It doesn't need to be done at bargain prices, just a fair, pre-crisis price would do. Now the Greeks walllow in assets, don't pay taxes and don't pay us back. If you can't pay that is one thing, but they can.
"...if Greece left the euro; its banks and corporate sector wouild be faced with bankruptcy (their debts would still be in euros but their revenues in devalued drachmas)."
Greece has suffered five long years of recession and much more to come. Non-competitive private companies with debts in Euros are on their way to the wall already. A public sector default and private sector bankruptcy would leave Greece debt free and a financial pariah. But financial pariahs always seem to work their way back into good graces within a couple of years (Argentina, for example).
Keeping Greece in the Euro seems cruel.
Argentina currently has a bond rating of B from Standard & Poor's. That's two notches up from D--Default. The country is certainly not in the good graces of the market and it has been ten years. Its debt-to-GDP ratio is incidentally about the same as in 2000, prior to it spiking as a result of the peso devaluation.
I believe Greeks bonds are at Ca and unlikely to improve any time soon and probably for many years to come while the creditors bleed Greece white. From where Greece is, a rating of B looks good.
That's from Moody's. It's a notch above C, meaning default. That's the Argentine bond rating for much of last decade. Unless a country settles the majority of outstanding claims (the threshold is around 90%, I believe), it will be considered in default by the rating agencies.
As I have pointed out on many occasions, defaulting does not nullify obligations. If Greece won't honor its obligations to other nations, other nations won't honor theirs to Greece. The only for Greece to not pay its debt at all is to become an autarky.
Greece can buy back its (defaulted) bonds at pennies on the euro. No legal claims left.
Ignore the private bondholders for a sec. Loans to Greece from other EU governments and the IMF total over €95 billion. These must be repaid. Unlike banks, which appreciates the time value of money, public entities have no need to settle. The IMF, for instance, is still waiting for Ethiopia to repay some loans it took out back in the 1980's. Debts could be in arrear, but they never go away. Sometimes, creditors agree to debt forgiveness. Poland got half of its foreign debt written off back in 1991. The World Bank granted some poor African countries 100% relief a few years ago. Given the enormous amount involved in the present case and the fact that most Western countries are broke, a full debt forgiveness to Greece is incredibly unlikely.
I know, you're going to say that Greece can simply refuse to pay. But how does it hope to trade with countries that it's stiffing? Imagine the following conversation between the Bank of Greece and the Bundesbank:
Bank of Greece: Lidl just bought €5 million worth of olives from one of our growers. How come our ECB account never got credited?
Bundesbank: You owe us money, b***h.
Public creditors will always act favorably-they are, after all, trying to save Greece.
The ECB bought its Greek bonds at a discount and some think that it may write them down to the price paid and sell them to the ESFS to help lighten the Greek debt load.
European private banks might be a problem, but I think they already off-loaded Greek debt to the ECB as collateral for LTRO loans.
I really do feel for the Greek populace on this. Some of the measures allegedly insisted upon by the Troika seem designed to inflame passions but I fear that this is mainly due to the electioneering in anticipation of an election within two months. The whole Papedemos government was doomed to failure given it's pre-determined short stay and more crucially the refusal of New Democracy to sign up to the whole concept back in October. This is in stark contrast to Italy where Mario Monti's term is open-ended and enjoys cross-party and popular support.
Yes, we're going to have accept write-downs of Greek debt across the board but the price will be to prevent a return to the bond markets after the write down. Eurostat is in Athens to stay and whoever wins the election is still going to have to dance to the tune played in Brussels. This is only way to convince markets that any default is going to be limited to Greece.
This is in stark contrast to Italy where Mario Monti's term is open-ended and enjoys cross-party and popular support.
Yes, but have the Italians ssen their (meagre) income drop by 50% in the last two years? The ineffective austerity measures imposed have ruined our lives, and those of our children.
The gold standard again. The 19th century saw 44 recessions and 6 depressions. The 20th century, 22 years of recessions with one depression. From a business cycle standpoint that gold system does not seem to be make any difference whatsoever...
Cutting recssions by half, and depressions by 80%, is no difference?!? Say rather that, on the evidence, the gold standard was much more of a problem than a solution.
Granted, we would like to think we know more about economics and how to (partially) manage it. But there simply is no evidence on hand that returning to a gold standard would improve things. It's a leap of faith, nothing more.
What of inflation?
Regards
Nevertheless, some in the US are hell-bent for getting back to that gold standard: they assert that countries now drowning in debts owe their misfortunes to the massive out of control money printing.
They do indeed assert that. What they do not do is show any evidence that the cure will be better than the disease.
Assumw, for the sake of discussion, that a gold standard would have prevented the debt problems that they see. First, there are a lot of countries which have somehow managed to avoid that problem without a gold standard, suggesting that it is not the only cure. Second, there were som serious problems the occurred when we were all on the gold standard. That, after all, is part of why everybody got off. But the gold standard enthusiasts never address how those problems, and the increased numbers of recessions and depressions that occurred, would be mitigated if we took their advice. (OK, admittedly some of them say that having more recessions would, on balance, be better for the economy. But I for one find that unconvincing.)
Yes, inflation is a problem whith floating currencies, whereas it does not seem the case with the dollar pegged to gold.
You’re right: the Swiss have a positive commercial balance despite a very strong currency, mostly due to innovative products and highly sophisticated manufacturing systems. A country under the gold standard having a negative commercial balance must absolutely adjust its industry costs in order to get back into equilibrium. Incidentally, one of the reason why Greece is in such a trouble today is mainly because the euro zone is set-up in a way not unlike the gold standard: they can’t devalue their way out of this.
What of it?
What if the Greeks default to everyone, private or official creditors, leave the Euro, bankrupt all its companies with debt in Euro, start printing new (worthless) money to issue to its pensioners? It would be damaging to other Euro countries, but would it not give the Greek economy the necessary adjustment? Sure, foreign creditors won't be keen to lend them anything for a while, but creditors have short term memory, and someone somewhere would take that risks sooner or later, with a reasoning that now that the previous debt was wiped clean, Greek debt can be reassessed at whatever is the current capacity?
Cut,cut,cut how much can you carry on cutting when there will a time whne there will be too small to cut, may be this will give you the idea of the dismall Gitmo, and out habits to cut,We have come to such a stage that we will use any language to express. Kicked out , after the fall in the economy. Squeezed by a tight job market, young Americans are especially struggling. They have suffered bigger income losses than other age groups and are less likely to be employed than at any time since World War II. An analysis by the Pew Research Center, released Thursday, details the impact of the recent recession on the attitudes of a generation of mostly 20- and 30-somethings. With government data showing record gaps in employment between young and old, a Pew survey found that 41 percent of Americans believe that younger adults have been hit harder than any other group, compared with 29 percent who say middle-aged Americans and 24 percent who point to seniors 65 and older. A wide majority of the public — at least 69 percent — also said it's more difficult for today's young adults than their parents' generation to pay for college, find a job, buy a home or save for the future. Among young adults ages 18 to 34, only a third rated their financial situation as "excellent" or "good," compared with 54 percent for seniors age 65 and over. In 2004, before the recession began, about half of both young and older adults rated their own financial situation highly. Germany has kicked out four Syrian diplomats after the arrest in Berlin earlier this week of two men suspected of spying on Syrian opposition activists in the country, the foreign ministry said Thursday."After the arrest of two suspected spies, I have ordered four members of the Syrian embassy in Berlin to be expelled," Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said in a statement. German prosecutors believe the two men, arrested Tuesday, had been spying for years for the intelligence services of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Steven Covey with his 8 habits would not buy this. And no wonder Republicans on the House Armed Services Committee slams both the Bush and Obama administrations for taking too many risks when releasing prisoners from Guantanamo Bay prison, Fox News has learned.. I wonder if this helps. I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA
The Greeks have been gaming the system(s) for years, indeed decades. This is just the latest in a long, long series of Greek financial crises brought on by a culture of lethargy, duplicity and malfeasance. Cue the apologist Greek Chorus...
Political lethargy, political duplicity, and political malfeasance. Political, not cultural. Who will clean the Aegean political stables? A Hercules indeed.