Jan 26th 2011, 11:05 by V.V.B.
RIVALS can quickly become allies if it makes business sense. Last year AXA Private Equity and Permira competed fiercely in takeover battles of two European travel websites. AXA won the upper hand in the bidding war for Go Voyages, a French travel website, while Permira snapped up eDreams, a Barcelona-based travel website that AXA also coveted. Now the two private-equity firms have joined forces in a takeover bid for Opodo, Europe’s biggest travel website.
With their recently formed alliance AXA and Permira are hoping to merge Opodo with Go Voyages and eDreams to create a proper European rival to Orbitz and Expedia, two American firms which are the market leaders. The official deadline for the bids in the auction of Opodo, run by JPMorgan, an investment bank, was January 25th. Apart from the private-equity duo, Carlyle, an American private-equity firm that owns Orizonia, a Spanish tour operator, and Expedia are likely to have submitted bids. In a few days Amadeus, the Spanish travel-technology firm that owns Opodo, is expected to reveal to whom it will sell the website, which was founded by a consortium of European airlines and first launched in 2001 in Germany.
Is consolidation good news for travellers? Generally a higher number of competitors means more choice for consumers, but in the fragmented online-travel business some consolidation is good news for buyers. The market leaders in France (Go Voyages) and Germany (Priceline) capture only a bit more then one-tenth of the online-travel market in their respective countries. Bigger companies have more negotiating power when they haggle over prices with airlines, hotels and insurance companies. “I don’t see a threat to consumers in a little more concentration,” says Christoph Klenner at the European Technology and Travel Services Association in Brussels.
The bigger question for European travel websites is how they can manage their relationship with airlines in the future. In America, the gloves are already off in what is increasingly a stand-off between airlines that want consumers to book directly on their websites and price-comparison websites, which lure consumers with claims that they offer the easiest way to shop around and find the cheapest flights. In December 2010 American Airlines stopped using all of Orbitz’s services as well as Expedia’s service for individual travellers because of a contract dispute. Southwest Airlines only makes its fares available on its website. And Delta Airlines told three smaller sites—CheapOair, OneTravel and BookIt—that their services were no longer required.
Cutting out the middle-men
The main sticking-point in the row between airlines and travel websites is the role of intermediaries such as Amadeus, Sabre, Galileo and Worldspan, which provide their technology, called global distribution systems (GDSs), to travel websites to search, price and book flights, hotels, cars, trains and cruises. American Airlines and others want to bypass the GDSs and have the travel websites link directly to the airlines' own reservation systems to save cost, but for the travel websites it would be more convenient if the airlines all kept providing reservations via the GDSs.
Europe is a more complex market than America so the GDSs are even more important there. Air France is good at selling its flights directly to customers in France, because it is the best known and most popular brand, but it needs the GDSs to bring in business from travellers in Britain. For British Airways, the reverse is true.
At the same time as the online-travel firms are consolidating to improve their bargaining power, while hoping to keep the airlines onboard, they are in the middle of a big change in their business model. They are worrying less and less about how many bookings are made via their websites, because they are shifting from relying on the transaction fees that such bookings bring to earning money from advertising—which now typically provides about half of their revenues. This makes the strength of a travel website's brand even more important, as well as the traffic generated by price-checking travellers, which explains why AXA and Permira will keep all three brands if they succeed in buying Opodo—as well as the GDS of either Amadeus, which Opodo and eDreams are currently using, or Worldspan, which is providing Go Voyages’ travel technology.
In this blog, our correspondents inform and entertain business travellers with news, views and reviews that help them make the most of life on the road. Sign up for our weekly "Gulliver's best" newsletter to have the blog's highlights delivered to your inbox »
Advertisement
Over the past five days
Over the past seven days
Advertisement
Readers' comments
The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.
Sort:
Do online travel portals only charge transaction fees?
Can someone please tell me how do these travel portals work? Do they purchase some tickets in bulk & then resell them & give discounts on a few of them? I mean their business model could be such that after selling the bulk-purchased tickets, they could just sell tickets remaining with the airlines using Global distribution systems.
I've heard different versions from people. I'd like to know how this industry works? Can anyone volunteer to make me cognizant about this industry? In return, I'll teach you all the physics & programming you can ever learn. Actually I'm making a transition from train-travel to air-travel. It's not that I've gotten richer, I already am, it's just that I lost my love for trains.
Thanks & Regards,
Dr Sheldon Cooper,
CSAIL,
MIT
(Previously at Caltech)
"Europe’s biggest travel website" What a joke. On what basis is Opodo Europe's biggest travel website? Doesn't the economist fact check anything anymore before publishing?
Opodo is not only not the number one, they are a relative nobody in most markets. Check U.K. - not even in top ten. Check France - #8.
I am not sure if at least when it comes to flights these webs are so advantegeous. It is more for hotel rooms. My experience is that the best prices for flights are at the homepages of the respecttive air company
Interesting note, the "GDS" systems listed were originally the DOS reservation operating systems for the USA based legacy carriers. These systems were spun off as seperate business entities. Appears now the legacy carriers no longer need their old tools/relationships and have developed other web based reservation systems.
Up until a couple of years ago, Expedia, Priceline, Cheapoair, etc... almost sistematically had better prices than the airlines themselves for exactly the same flight.
This is no longer true.
I have been doing a considerable amount of travelling, paying out of my own pocket, and I have lately concluded that I often am better off by booking the flights with the airlines themselves. Not always, but most often.
I still use, and a lot, the travel agencies sites in order to find which is the cheapest flight for the day and destiny I want and THEN going to the airline's travel site.
There are very heavy routes with more than 10 different flights in a single day with enormous price differences.
By doing this, I find through the agencies which is the cheapest flight of the day and then book directly with the airline.
It has worked beautifully in the last maybe ten flights I booked.
Fighting for an increasing share in a shrinking market, travel agencies and its websites are going the way of buggy whips
merging or splitting, all of these business activities are determined by the margins of revenues and costs.